A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water for the duration of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
For the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all operates are carried out depending on Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are René Collier and Paul Feely fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning disorders. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.